Skip to content

FDA product code · Clinical Chemistry

NBWSystem, Test, Blood Glucose, Over The Counter

Product code NBW covers System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over The Counter, a Class II device regulated under 21 CFR 862.1345. FDA has cleared 509 devices in this code, 2 of them in the last 12 months. Median review time across the 509 most recent decisions is 153 days. openFDA lists 137 recall records against this code.

Updated · ingest status · JSON

Class
Class II
Regulation
21 CFR 862.1345
Review panel
Clinical Chemistry
Clearances
509

What is happening in NBW right now?

NBW (System, Test, Blood Glucose, Over The Counter) has two findings, most consequential first. 5 recalls opened in the last 12 months and not yet terminated (Class I, Class II) (Z-1545-2026, Z-1546-2026, Z-1547-2026, Z-1548-2026, Z-0413-2026). The code is crowded, scoring 62 of 100 — 113 companies hold a clearance here and 2 arrived in the last 12 months (NBW:crowding).

Every factor behind the statement above, most consequential first, with the FDA records it came from.
FindingHow much it mattersFDA records
RecallClass I recallZ-1545-2026, Z-1546-2026, Z-1547-2026, Z-1548-2026, Z-0413-2026
CrowdingContextNBW:crowding

Sources checked: predicate ancestry, recalls, adverse events, new entrants, review time, crowding. Composed . Every finding carries the record ids it was derived from; nothing here is an estimate.

How many devices has FDA cleared in NBW?

FDA has cleared 509 devices under product code NBW since the 510(k) programme began in 1976, 2 of them in the last 12 months.

Source: openFDA device/510k · retrieved

Most recent 510(k) clearances in NBW, newest first.
510(k)DeviceApplicantDecision
K262116TRUE METRIX Self Monitoring Blood Glucose SystemTrividia Health, Inc.
K250085On Call® Sure GK Blood Glucose & Ketone Monitoring System; On Call® Sure Sync GK Blood Glucose & Ketone Monitoring SystemACON Laboratories, Inc.
K243060TeleRPM Gen2 Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemGuangdong Transtek Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.
K240637RIGHTEST Blood Glucose Monitoring System Max TelBionime Corporation
K240640Sejoy Blood Glucose Monitoring System; Sejoy Advance Link Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemSejoy Biomedical Co., Ltd.
K241787CONTOUR® PLUS BLUE Blood Glucose Monitoring System; CONTOUR® NEXT GEN Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemAscensia Diabetes Care U.S., Inc.
K222126VivaChek™ Fad Blood Glucose Monitoring System, VivaChek™ Fad Smart Blood Glucose Monitoring System, VivaChek™ Fad Sync Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemVivachek Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.
K241304WaveSense Jazz Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemAgamatrix
K231679CONTOUR® PLUS BLUE Blood Glucose Monitoring SystemAscensia Diabetes Care
K231192RIGHTEST Blood Glucose Monitoring System Max TelBionime Corporation

How long does FDA review take for NBW?

The median FDA review time for NBW is 153 days, measured across the 509 most recent decisions with both a received date and a decision date.

Review time here is decision date minus date received, as published by FDA. It is elapsed calendar time, not FDA review days — the two differ whenever the agency stops the clock for an additional information request.

Source: openFDA device/510k · retrieved

Are there recalls in NBW?

openFDA lists 137 recall records against product code NBW. A recall record covers one firm's corrective action and may span many device lots.

  • Z-1545-2026Open, ClassifiedTrividia Health, Inc.

    The system labeling (user manual and online labeling) did not provide adequate directions for lay users to act on the E-5 error code. The error code description and recommended actions for the E-5 error code in the labeling do not: (a) clearly emphasize that an E-5 error code could represent a very high blood glucose level, and (b) prominently convey the appropriate immediate actions, such as contacting a healthcare professional. This could lead to a delay in treatment if the user does not seek medical attention immediately when receiving an E-5 error code and experiencing symptoms of high glucose.

  • Z-1546-2026Open, ClassifiedTrividia Health, Inc.

    The system labeling (user manual and online labeling) did not provide adequate directions for lay users to act on the E-5 error code. The error code description and recommended actions for the E-5 error code in the labeling do not: (a) clearly emphasize that an E-5 error code could represent a very high blood glucose level, and (b) prominently convey the appropriate immediate actions, such as contacting a healthcare professional. This could lead to a delay in treatment if the user does not seek medical attention immediately when receiving an E-5 error code and experiencing symptoms of high glucose.

  • Z-1547-2026Open, ClassifiedTrividia Health, Inc.

    The system labeling (user manual and online labeling) did not provide adequate directions for lay users to act on the E-5 error code. The error code description and recommended actions for the E-5 error code in the labeling do not: (a) clearly emphasize that an E-5 error code could represent a very high blood glucose level, and (b) prominently convey the appropriate immediate actions, such as contacting a healthcare professional. This could lead to a delay in treatment if the user does not seek medical attention immediately when receiving an E-5 error code and experiencing symptoms of high glucose.

  • Z-1548-2026Open, ClassifiedTrividia Health, Inc.

    The system labeling (user manual and online labeling) did not provide adequate directions for lay users to act on the E-5 error code. The error code description and recommended actions for the E-5 error code in the labeling do not: (a) clearly emphasize that an E-5 error code could represent a very high blood glucose level, and (b) prominently convey the appropriate immediate actions, such as contacting a healthcare professional. This could lead to a delay in treatment if the user does not seek medical attention immediately when receiving an E-5 error code and experiencing symptoms of high glucose.

  • Z-0413-2026Open, ClassifiedTrividia Health, Inc.

    Manufacturing defect causing LCD display issues with missing or partial segments (ghosting) that can result in misreading glucose values, potentially leading to inappropriate treatment decisions for diabetes management.

Showing the 5 most recently initiated of 137. Recall class comes from openFDA's enforcement endpoint, which does not carry every recall — where it is missing, none is shown rather than guessed. Status is FDA's own wording; a terminated recall is a closed one, and the total spans the code's whole history, not just what is open today.

Source: openFDA device/recall · retrieved

How many adverse events are reported for NBW?

MAUDE holds 17,504 adverse-event reports naming product code NBW, 3,029 of them received in the last 12 months.

MAUDE reports are submitted by manufacturers, importers, user facilities and the public. They are unverified, and a report is not proof that the device caused the event.

Source: openFDA device/event · retrieved

Is adverse-event reporting in NBW unusual?

Every month with enough history behind it falls inside NBW's own expected range. Nothing here is unusual for this code.

Monthly adverse-event reports naming NBW, against the expected range computed from this code's own history. Shaded band is the expected range; a bar above it is the month flagged. Retrieved 11 August 2026.
Reports received per month for NBW, with the expected range and whether the month fell outside it.
MonthReportsExpectedVerdict
688Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
671Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
736Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
509Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
656Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
594Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
447Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
575Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
466Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
658Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
553Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
453Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
657Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
544Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
374Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
566Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
473Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
469Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
507Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
479Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
487Insufficient historyNo expected range — too little history
377274–623Within expected (274–623)
368232–510Within expected (232–510)
361264–562Within expected (264–562)
369251–576Within expected (251–576)
404287–459Within expected (287–459)
389322–467Within expected (322–467)
376507–734Below expected (507–734)
415282–542Within expected (282–542)
413297–573Within expected (297–573)
428287–564Within expected (287–564)
361264–505Within expected (264–505)
363291–545Within expected (291–545)
491318–606Within expected (318–606)
370278–520Within expected (278–520)
298304–550Below expected (304–550)

21 months do not have a full, unbroken year of history before them, so no expected range is shown for those. Insufficient history is reported as insufficient rather than as zero: an empty baseline would turn a gap in our data into a spike. Method: ewma_alpha_0.3_sd_2 corpus_adjusted. Counts are divided by the corpus-wide volume for that month before comparison, so a rise across all of MAUDE is not reported as a rise in NBW.

What are the predicate devices in NBW?

FDA publishes no machine-readable predicate field, so no predicate chain is recorded for this code yet.

A predicate chain matters because a device inherits the safety history of what it was compared to. FDA publishes the chain only inside each 510(k) summary PDF, never as data — so where we have edges, they are read from those documents, and where we do not, we say so instead of showing an empty list.

Who files 510(k)s in NBW?

Across the 509 most recent decisions, these applicants filed most often in NBW.

Most frequent applicants in NBW among recent decisions.
ApplicantRecent clearances
Taidoc Technology Corporation65
I-Sens, Inc.21
Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.18
Apex BioTechnology Corp.18
Bionime Corporation18

Applicant names above are exactly as FDA published them, so one company can appear under several spellings.

The same makers, after name resolution

2 companies in NBW file under more than one spelling. Resolving them to one identity — across all six datasets, not just this one — is what makes a joined count possible at all.

Companies in NBW whose FDA filings use more than one spelling of the same name.
CompanyClearancesFDA spellings merged
Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.192
Roche Diagnostics Corporation193

Merges are measured against a hand-labelled sample and held above 98% precision; pairs the matcher is unsure of are queued for a person rather than merged. See DeviceSignal.

Source: openFDA device/510k · retrieved

Watch NBW

Get an email the morning anything changes in NBW — a new clearance, a recall, or an adverse-event spike above this code's own baseline.

Start watching NBW

Data on this page comes from FDA's public openFDA API and is US public domain (CC0). DeviceSignal is an independent commercial service and is not affiliated with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information only, not regulatory advice. Verify anything you rely on against open.fda.gov.